Smokin’ That Huckabee 21 March 09

Make Room For Zionism Y'all

Yo’, I’d like to put any and all of the Jewish readers in the audience under the spotlight for a moment.

I passed on copying & pasting A LOT of fucked up bullschitt related to Israel’s most recent bully-ass tactics in Gaza (this past winter). 

You know.

We know.

But now…I need you guys to huddle up and figure out why the Israeli governments bullschitt don’t make a lick of goddamn sense. For all the marzipan pride rattling around in your heads and hearts, I’d like to stare down the most pig-headed of you into a puddle of hominy.                                                   

Stop making me sick with all of this selective reasoning and piss drivel. Your homeland is on some Suge Knight/Gangsta Rap manifest destiny.                        The influence it has on my own homeland (hey, stars & stripes) is very “spoiled gay uncle”.

Rahm Emmanuel…you can be a closet Zionist in your closet, but don’t come to the dinner table in your funky brown shirt and stormtropper boots, okay player?

*(start swipe)*

Durban II: Politicizing Racism

By Ramzy Baroud

13 March, 2009

Many countries are set to participate in the Conference against Racism, scheduled to be held in Geneva, April 20-25. But the highly touted international meet is already marred with disagreement after Israel, the United States and other countries decided not to participate. Although the abstention of four or more countries is immaterial to the proceedings, the US decision in particular was meant to render the conference ‘controversial’, at best.

The US government’s provoking stance is not new, but a repetition of another fiasco which took place in Durban, South Africa in 2001.

Israeli and US representatives stormed out in protest of the “anti-Israeli” and the “anti-Semitic” sentiments that supposedly pervaded the World Conference against Racism (WCAR), held in Durban in 2001. The decision was an ominous sign, for the Bush Administration was yet to be tested on foreign policy in any definite terms, as the conference concluded on September 8, three days before the 911 terrorist attacks.

The US justified its denunciation of the international forum, then on the very same, unsubstantiated grounds cited by Israel, that the forum was transformed to a stage for anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic rhetoric.

But was “the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and related intolerance” indeed transformed into a stage for racism and bigotry, as Israel’s friends, lead amongst them the Bush Administration, charged?

What indeed took place at the conference was democracy in its best manifestations, where no country could defy international consensus with the use of a veto power, or could flex its economic muscles to bend the will of the international community. The result was, of course, disturbing from the view point of those who refuse to treat all United Nations member states with equity and impartiality. An African demand for a separate apology from every country that benefited from slavery, to every African nation that suffered from slavery was considered excessive, and eventually discounted.

But the main “controversial” issue that led to the US representative’s departure from the conference was the criticism by many countries of Israel’s racism against the Palestinians. A majority of countries called for reinstituting UN General Assembly resolution 3379 which in 1975 equated Zionism with racism.

The conference, then, was not meant to only address the issue of Palestine and Israel. However, the strong American resistance to any criticism of the racially motivated practices of the Israeli state – the extreme violence, the land theft, the Wall, the settlements, the protracted military occupation, etc – pushed the issue to center stage.

The Palestinian struggle is not meant to overshadow the struggles of oppressed nations around the world, but it rather compliments the calls for rights, freedom and liberation that continue to echo around the globe. However, the fact that the illegal and violent mass oppression of Palestinians, as practiced openly by the Israeli state continue unabated – and is rather defended and justified by the United States and other European powers – highlights the historical legacy championed by former colonial powers throughout the so-called third world for so many years.

There are hardly many international forums that are held and governed by principals of equality and fairness amongst nations. The World Conference against Racism is one of very few, indeed. It was not a surprise, therefore, to witness the international solidarity with the Palestinian and world-wide repulsion of the racist and Apartheid policies carried out daily by Israel.

But the mere censure of Israel’s unfair, undemocratic and racist policies – let alone taking any action to bring them to a halt – is mechanically considered anti-Semitic from an Israeli standpoint and US administrations.

The US conditioned its participation of the April conference in Geneva (Durban II) by removing any specific censure of Israel, and ensuring that Israel is not ‘singled out’ for criticism. Although US sensibilities constantly expect, but demand the singling out of any country, leader or group it deems rouge, war criminal, or terrorist, Israel is treated based on different standards. “A bad document became worse, and the US decided not to participate in the conference”, Israeli daily, Haaretz, reported in reference to the draft documents being finalized before the conference.

The original “bad” document apparently dubs Israel “an occupying state that carries out racist policies”, a description which is consistent with international law, UN resolutions and the views of leading world human rights defenders – Archbishop Desmond Tutu, John Dugard, the former UN Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian Territories, Richard Falk,the current UN’s envoy, among many others.

The ‘bad document’ might have ‘became worse’ with new references to the Gaza bloodbath, which killed and wounded nearly 7,000 Palestinians in 22-days.

From an American – and unfortunately, Canadian and Italian, so far – viewpoint, such inhumane practices don’t warrant a pause or mere words of condemnation. The same, of course, doesn’t apply to Sudan, Zimbabwe, Iran, Cuba and other ‘unfriendly’ nations. The US decision must be particularity disheartening to African nations who saw in the advent of Barack Obama some vindication. The US first black president, however, saw it fit to boycott a conference that intended to discuss the issue of slavery and repatriation, to once again prove that race alone is hardly sufficient in explaining US internal and external policies.

A day after rebuffing the conference, US Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton arrived on her first visit to the Middle East, where she admonished Iran, Hamas and Hizbollah – for largely posing threats to Israel – and praised the Jewish state and its ‘moderate’ allies.

She remarked in a joint statement with Israeli president Shimon Peres, on March 3: “It is important that the United States always underscore our unshakeable, durable, fundamental relationship and support for the State of Israel. I will be going from here to Yad VaShem to pay respects to the lost souls, to remember those who the Holocaust took, to lay a wreath, and to say a prayer.”

(Editors Note: Never forget what propaganda looks or sounds like –

Needless to say, Mrs. Clinton refused to visit Gaza, where 1.5 million people are trapped in one large concentration camp, denied access to food, medicine, political and human rights.


President Obama, please don’t let Israel’s bully tactics be the schitt stain in your drawers.



Filed under Vibrations

2 responses to “Smokin’ That Huckabee 21 March 09

  1. Not that this relates, but I was curious at to your opinion on something: If you had watched any of the New Battlestar Galactica, did you notice how much the new show seems to dislike colored people? I.e.: 1) The two primary black characters from the first version of the show get converted to a white man and an asian woman. 2) The main black female character on the new show kills herself. 3) The dark indian character gets strangled by a white man on the last show. 4) Not a single black person makes it to Earth at the end. 5) Even the black cylon gets killed.

    I feel like I am the only one who noticed this, and I am trying to find out if anyone else noticed it too.

  2. Subsidized Housing In Space, my man…c’mon.
    Soul Brothers & Sisters been getting played in the Sci-fi world since Uhuru stepped on the Enterprise.
    “Lando Calrissian”, Jar-Jar’s Black Ass, Sister that wrote the Matrix.
    I see the “No Black To The Future” delusion as one of taking issue with the common ancestry (read that African) and origin.
    If my history book starts in Greece, then of course Levar Burton has to wear them Kool Moe Dee shades, and of course Worf has a scrotum head…token negroes can’t NEVER be cool in a whiteboy fantasy.

    Imagine if Will Smith hadn’t passed on the Neo role for the Matrix?

    No Obama?

    Who knows, this poker game presses on. Raise the stakes, Black man.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s